Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 13:56, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:02:09AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > Also the Driscoll is very annoying by using a false email address so it
> > can't be replied to.
>
> As far as I'm concerned, mail that can't be replied to *is* spam.
Fair enough.
Ava Driscoll is a spammer then.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Reply to: