Re: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken
- From: Tollef Fog Heen <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 10:01:24 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Mail-followup-to: email@example.com
- In-reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (Kalle Kivimaa's message of "Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:07:58 +0300")
- References: <email@example.com> <20030827104434.GA25552@pol.ac.uk> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20030827123215.GA14706@projectcolo.org.uk> <email@example.com>
* Kalle Kivimaa
| And yes, I'm actually considering filing grave bugs against each
| such list software package (I'm willing to live with such behaviour
| being optional with the default being no response, if the
| documentation says "beware SPAM worms if you enable autoresponse).
Please file a wishlist bug against mailman to change the default for
sending a response when holding a message.
(The feature is there, it's optional, but after seeing your argument,
I agree that the default should be changed.)
Tollef Fog Heen ,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :