Re: Accepted gdesklets-data 0.13.1 (all source)
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 08:32:10PM -0400, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Source: gdesklets-data
> Binary: gdesklets-data
> Architecture: source all
> Version: 0.13.1
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
> Changed-By: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
> Description:
> gdesklets-data - displays and sensors for gdesklets
> Closes: 207088
> Changes:
> gdesklets-data (0.13.1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
> * Fixed the wrong directory in README.Debian (Closes: #207088).
> Files:
> 85b18c208186cbe6a86b48c23e78b9d3 526 x11 optional gdesklets-data_0.13.1.dsc
> 5b5c46862fbb651b34ef1c090cbcd776 344185 x11 optional gdesklets-data_0.13.1.tar.gz
> c18e378be01cbdb68d8121b464eada4b 319230 x11 optional gdesklets-data_0.13.1_all.deb
Is it a common practice to use this kind of numbering (without a second part after
a dash) for what I presume is a debian-made tarball (multiple upstream tarballs
put together).
gdesklets-data_0.13.1_all.deb
Also (related) why not use a orig.tar.gz file?
My understanding is that the difference between 0.13.1 and 0.13, because
only the README.Debian has changed, it would have been a good thing to
base it on the previous tarball.
Christophe
--
Christophe Barbé <christophe.barbe@ufies.org>
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E
There is no snooze button on a cat who wants breakfast.
Reply to: