[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Accepted gdesklets-data 0.13.1 (all source)

On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 08:32:10PM -0400, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Source: gdesklets-data
> Binary: gdesklets-data
> Architecture: source all
> Version: 0.13.1
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
> Changed-By: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
> Description: 
>  gdesklets-data - displays and sensors for gdesklets
> Closes: 207088
> Changes: 
>  gdesklets-data (0.13.1) unstable; urgency=low
>  .
>    * Fixed the wrong directory in README.Debian (Closes: #207088).
> Files: 
>  85b18c208186cbe6a86b48c23e78b9d3 526 x11 optional gdesklets-data_0.13.1.dsc
>  5b5c46862fbb651b34ef1c090cbcd776 344185 x11 optional gdesklets-data_0.13.1.tar.gz
>  c18e378be01cbdb68d8121b464eada4b 319230 x11 optional gdesklets-data_0.13.1_all.deb

Is it a common practice to use this kind of numbering (without a second part after 
a dash) for what I presume is a debian-made tarball (multiple upstream tarballs
put together).


Also (related) why not use a orig.tar.gz file?
My understanding is that the difference between 0.13.1 and 0.13, because
only the README.Debian has changed, it would have been a good thing to
base it on the previous tarball.


Christophe Barbé <christophe.barbe@ufies.org>
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8  F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E

There is no snooze button on a cat who wants breakfast.

Reply to: