Re: Bits from the RM

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bits from the RM
From: Joe Drew <hoserhead@woot.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:41:40 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 1061577700.4676.52.camel@albatross>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87zni2459b.fsf@yiwaz.raw.no>
References: <20030819064925.GA6376@azure.humbug.org.au> <[🔎] 200308200949.08925.avbidder@fortytwo.ch> <[🔎] 20030820213745.GE977@sikanda> <[🔎] 87zni2459b.fsf@yiwaz.raw.no>

On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 01:42, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Teófilo Ruiz Suárez 
> 
> | What about Apache? Should we change the apache2 package to apache?
> 
> No.  (Wearing apache & apache2 maintainer hat.)

What are the criteria for the apache package to become Apache 2?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bits from the RM
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
- Re: Bits from the RM
  - From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@raw.no>

References:
- Re: Bits from the RM
  - From: Adrian von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>
- Re: Bits from the RM
  - From: Teófilo Ruiz Suárez <teo@debian.org>
- Re: Bits from the RM
  - From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@raw.no>

Prev by Date: Re: GR: Disambiguation of Section 4.1.5 of the constitution
Next by Date: Re: Re: Patents, gimp-nonfree and LAME
Previous by thread: Re: Bits from the RM
Next by thread: Re: Bits from the RM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread