On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 07:27:50PM +0100, Matthew Woodcraft wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > Every single argument in support of shipping the RFCs with our > > operating system could be applied just as well to the question of > > shipping Netscape 4 in Debian (in years past), or qmail, or any number > > of other /useful/, or /common/ pieces of software, or software written > > by beings of goodwill. > I can see one difference that might be relevant. > One good solution to 'Netscape isn't free' was to write a free > replacement. I don't think that option is available for RFCs. They're > not typically worded rigorously enough to make it possible to come up > with a different form of words with the same meaning. Oh? Which browser in the archive is a suitable free replacement for Netscape, written from scratch? :) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgp4n9Hv0WQjy.pgp
Description: PGP signature