Re: [Debian-au] Debian 10th birthday gear

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Debian-au] Debian 10th birthday gear
From: Emile van Bergen <emile-deb@evbergen.xs4all.nl>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 13:37:55 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030713113755.GA15888@evbergen.xs4all.nl>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030713050603.GG26717@deadbeast.net>
References: <[🔎] 20030708073621.GE7269@yeenoghu.progsoc.uts.edu.au> <[🔎] 1058065486.1095.9.camel@obair.ap.babcockbrown.com> <[🔎] 20030713050603.GG26717@deadbeast.net>

Hi,

On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 12:06:03AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:

> Anybody else get a bad cryptographic signature on the message to which I
> am replying?

AOL.

-- 
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen           emile@e-advies.nl      
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153           http://www.e-advies.nl

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Debian-au] Debian 10th birthday gear
  - From: ZHAO Wei <zhaoway@public1.ptt.js.cn>

References:
- Debian 10th birthday gear
  - From: Anand Kumria <akumria@debian.org>
- Re: [Debian-au] Debian 10th birthday gear
  - From: Craige McWhirter <tongmaster@arseclown.tv>
- Re: [Debian-au] Debian 10th birthday gear
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Qt3 still broken (compat-headers), what to do?
Next by Date: Re: the RFC mess: tentative summary
Previous by thread: Re: [Debian-au] Debian 10th birthday gear
Next by thread: Re: [Debian-au] Debian 10th birthday gear
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread