On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 07:50:07AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 02:42:10PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > And, incidentally, the specific issue you address has -- I'm sure you'll > > be quite startled -- discussed at length on debian-legal. Maybe you > > ought to check out those archives? > > I'm well aware that some people have flogged the horse. That doesn't > mean these people have reached a satisfactory conclusion, that they are > "right" in any sense of the word or that said conclusion is consistent > with other opinions voiced by these people. > > Again, I'm not talking about the legal document, I'm talking about the > file. The statement I quoted does not allow for modifications, no > matter the purpose. > > Now, would you care to be self-consequent? If you have something _new_ to add to the discussion, please do so (on -legal). Otherwise, kindly piss off. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing, `. `' | Imperial College, `- -><- | London, UK
Attachment:
pgp6rbKnOgZ2D.pgp
Description: PGP signature