On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:17:50PM +0200, Julien LEMOINE wrote: > First of all, I present my excuses for having started a new debate > about debconf in debian-devel. > Secondly, to reply to every person who thinks I should have created a > more "user friendly" migration who did not break backwards compatibility. > My answer is that I have no time to implement command line support for > stunnel 4.x. It is not your responsibility to fix all of upstream's bugs, but it *is* your responsibility to protect Debian users from upstream breakage as much as possible. This upstream change makes no sense from a usability standpoint; this new stunnel package would be pretty useless to me, and I wouldn't want to have it automatically installed on my systems if I were using the previous, working version. By the time a debconf note is sent, it's too late. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpYp5dqF0Y9R.pgp
Description: PGP signature