Hi. Julien LEMOINE wrote: > First of all, I present my excuses for having started a new debate > about debconf in debian-devel. But then, the last one didn't favor your opinion. > Secondly, to reply to every person who thinks I should have created a > more "user friendly" migration who did not break backwards compatibility. > My answer is that I have no time to implement command line support for > stunnel 4.x. Yes. But you still have the options of: - Publically asking if someone else has time and skill to do it. - Putting off the update and/or packaging the interface incompatible stunnel under a new name. > Finally, since there is not really a policy about when to use debconf, > I will respect the DFSG  and add a debconf warning  in the > stunnel package. There is a difference between the social contract and the DFSG. As a user of stunnel: Your warning will not help me as it does not keep stunnel from breaking. *Not* installing a totally incompatible program where the stunnel I wanted when I said "apt-get install stunnel" would. Cheers T.
Description: PGP signature