Re: Debconf or not debconf
Julien LEMOINE <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I received a bug report on stunnel package from an user  that
> complained about the fact that I didn't warning about the new
> /etc/default/stunnel file introduced in package (thereis a note in
> README.Debian and in changelog).
> Since debconf is not really appreciated for this use, what is the
> best solution ? Inform users with debconf or give them informations
> only in changelog and README.Debian ?
Is this just the usual default file for modifying the init-script's
behaviour, i.e. will the package just continue to work as it did if
the user does not know about it?
If yes, perhaps a comment in the init-script would be helpful.