[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i386 anymore



Morning .. 

On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:04:54PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>And not only 80386 needs this - There is the Sparc64 port which would
>also benefit from this (http://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/#64bit). If we
>had support for subarchtectures, not only would the ix86 mess be able to
>be split in many flavors (i.e. strict 386, 486 and up, 686, or whatever
>you fancy). And I am sure this can somehow help maintain the non-Linux
>ports - NetBSD gives us the potential to bring Debian to _many_ new
>platforms. 

In my opinion, this would be the right way. Sure, this is a lot of work,
but we, if we splitt the arches up into suparches, we will be able to
use optimization for eg. 586/686 or on PowerPC altivec for G4 and so on.
And, of course, we can keep the support 80386.

		Regards
				Jan
-- 
  .''`.    Jan-Hendrik Palic     |
 : :' : ** Debian GNU/ Linux **  |   ** OpenOffice.org **       ,.. ,..
 `. `'   http://www.debian.org   | http://www.openoffice.org  ,: ..`   `
   `-  jan.palic@linux-debian.de |                           '  `  `

Attachment: pgpzf39yA7Be0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: