[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Status of testing migration is improving



Some of you might remember my script to summarize the excuses list for
package migration from sid to testing.  I've posted it twice already.
The updated list is available from
<URL:http://developer.skolelinux.no/info/cdbygging/distdiff-all.html.gz>.

The situation is a lot better now then it was in april.  But there
seem to be some autobuild problems on m68k.  The newest stats are at
the top.

Statistics from update_excuses.html generated 2003.06.17 23:34:05 +0000.

  - 1462 packages total.
  - 1461 packages with differences.
  - 428 valid packages.
  - 345 buggy packages.
  - 950 packages over age.
  - 472 packages to young.
  - 32 packages marked for removal.
  - Archiectures missing packages: m68k(200) arm(155) alpha(133)
                                   s390(122) mips(115) ia64(113)
                                   mipsel(103) powerpc(95) sparc(91)
                                   hppa(68) i386(8)

Statistics from update_excuses.html generated 2003.04.21 23:32:16 +0000.

  - 2274 packages total.
  - 2269 packages with differences.
  - 1106 valid packages.
  - 365 buggy packages.
  - 1634 packages over age.
  - 570 packages to young.
  - 48 packages marked for removal.
  - Archiectures missing packages: arm(216) m68k(186) alpha(172)
                                   hppa(145) ia64(128) s390(123)
                                   powerpc(115) sparc(115) mips(115)
                                   mipsel(102) i386(6)

Statistics from update_excuses.html generated 2003.04.09

  - 2164 packages total.
  - 2148 packages with differences.
  - 1020 valid packages.
  - 372 buggy packages.
  - 1549 packages over age.
  - 533 packages to young.
  - 46 packages marked for removal.
  - Archiectures missing packages: arm(210) alpha(186) m68k(177)
                                   hppa(150) mips(144) ia64(139)
                                   powerpc(126) s390(123) sparc(120)
                                   mipsel(112) i386(6)



Reply to: