Re: Changelogs (Re: Bug#193497: marked as done (svtools: svsetup uses bashism "echo -e"))
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 20:34:58 +1000, Herbert Xu <email@example.com> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> Deciding what goes into the changelog based on the magnitude and
>>> effects of changes make some sense, but deciding it based on what
>>> has been filed in the BTS is just pointless.
>> Well, in my opinion changes which cause bugs reported against the
>> package to be closed are changes of some significance; but that is
>> just me.
> Even if the bug is for upstream fixing a typo in a comment? :)
If it caused a Debian bug to be closed, that is a significant
change in status for the Debian package (it may not be for the
upstream software being packaged, but it is for my package).
"I asked you not to have a spaz attack in tx.general, BUT NOOOOO!!!!"
Karl, via John Belushi
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C