[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#154829: Is a bug "grave" if the package is unusable for at least two architectures (Was: Bug#154829: Aido problems on 64 bit architectures)



On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 04:06:36PM -0700, Mike Markley wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:08:49AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be> wrote:
> My logic is that it segfaults on startup on very few architectures,

Making the package completely useless on some architectures is grave
-- basically, imagine if you've only got machines of the particular
architecture affected; or imagine if the same problem hit only i386
machines. In essence, the principle is that if you see a package in
dselect, but can't use it no matter what you do or want to do, that's
utterly unacceptable.

The only exception that we're making at present if for uninstallable
arch:all packages on non-i386, and that's only because we can't come up
with a good alternative way of handling those packages.

Cheers,
/\_
aj, with release manager hat on

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

  ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- 
        you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''

Attachment: pgpbSJXzb5fYP.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: