Re: Every spam is sacred
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 20:03:59 +0100, Simon Huggins <email@example.com> said:
> Well yes and no. What about open relays? Surely it is always
> acceptable, even with false positives, to reject mail from open
> relays as the admins should fix them and users should realise that
> the server they are sending mail through is contributing to the
> global spam problem.
I am not yet convinced about acceptable collateral damage. At
the very least I am opposed to other people making the decision for
me. Advisory tagging may be acceptable, but blocking mail before it
reaches me is something I am uneasy about.
"Let us condemn to hellfire all those who disagree with us." militant
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C