Re: Bug#193497: marked as done (svtools: svsetup uses bashism "echo -e")
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, John Hasler wrote:
> mdz writes:
> > Do we need to legislate good sense now?
> If you want all bug closures mentioned in the Debian changelog, change
> policy so that it says so. I read the present policy document as requiring
> that the Debian changelog mention only changes to the Debian-specific part
> of the package. If this is not what you mean, clarify it.
Do you agree that closing bugs thru debian/changelog is easier than the old
fashion way of using ####-firstname.lastname@example.org? Do you agree that because it
is easier, it saves you time?
So, if it saves you time, why aren't you writing better changelogs?
If people really think that:
* Closes: #1234
is appropriate in a changelog, then consider when we didn't have this feature.
be a valid line in a changelog? No, it wouldn't.