Re: Maintaining kernel source in sarge
Matt wrote:
> The part you seem to have missed is the distinction between a source package
> and a binary package in what I wrote above.
Not completely, although the time between reading and answering did
not help me to be 100% clear with this :)
> I do not think this is a practical idea to work toward at this time,
> however.
Yes, a new generation of source packages is needed, but if we could
settle the kernel-packaging issue without this, that would at least
help to get it running for sarge...
Regards,
--
Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> | Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <dirson@debian.org> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro: <yann.dirson@fr.alcove.com> | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
Reply to: