[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Maintaining kernel source in sarge

Matt wrote:
> The part you seem to have missed is the distinction between a source package
> and a binary package in what I wrote above.

Not completely, although the time between reading and answering did
not help me to be 100% clear with this :)

> I do not think this is a practical idea to work toward at this time,
> however.

Yes, a new generation of source packages is needed, but if we could
settle the kernel-packaging issue without this, that would at least
help to get it running for sarge...

Yann Dirson    <ydirson@altern.org> |    Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <dirson@debian.org> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro:    <yann.dirson@fr.alcove.com> |  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
     http://ydirson.free.fr/        | Check <http://www.debian.org/>

Reply to: