Hi, Jesus Climent wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:47:52PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > > * New Upstream Version (closes: #176227, #188308, #90276) > > > > > > Changelog abuse. This is only a valid entry if all 3 of these bugs were > > > requests for a new version, which they were not. > > > > to me it reads: "fixed by the new version". which is perfectly valid. > > To me it does not. I close bugs with "New Upstream Version" when the bugs were > requesting a new version because upstream released a new one. > > They should read, at least: > > * The new version closes: ... That's shit too. * New Upstream version - explanation of the bug or fix (closes: #nr) ... ... would be the best solution. Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
pgphDpx56zUxD.pgp
Description: PGP signature