Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)
Em Thu, 22 May 2003 01:26:27 +0200, Bernd Eckenfels <email@example.com>
> On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:55:36PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > It's much more helpful to write this as:
> yes of course, but the question is where the line between helpfulness and
> usefulness is :)
> At least I think it is not a good idea to talk about "abuse" if maintainers
> save themself some work. This might have the opposite effet than desired.
That's *very* useful, too. And that would save people a lot of work when
tracking problem causes, etc. It will not kill adding a few more details
when closing a bug, and that makes the changelog much more useful.
This is the way I do:
* New upstream release
- it seems like the loooong CC is not a problem anymore
- IMAP has gone through a lot of work, so I believe this should
be fixed. Also, this version is supposed to fix the 'io blocking'
thingy. (Closes: #164101)
Damn, it evens helps the submitter to understand what problem has
been fixed when he receives the notification.
firstname.lastname@example.org: Gustavo Noronha <http://people.debian.org/~kov>
Debian: <http://www.debian.org> * <http://www.debian-br.org>
Dúvidas sobre o Debian? Visite o Rau-Tu: http://rautu.cipsga.org.br