Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: > On Wed, 21 May 2003 12:24:42 -0700, Brian Nelson <email@example.com> said: > >> reopen 192068 thanks > >> John O'Sullivan <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: > >>> Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:40:18 +0100 Source: ptkei >>> Binary: ptkei Architecture: source all Version: 1.18.0-4 >>> Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: John O'Sullivan >>> <email@example.com> Changed-By: John O'Sullivan <firstname.lastname@example.org> >>> Description: ptkei - Python TK Empire Interface Changes: ptkei >>> (1.18.0-4) unstable; urgency=low . >>> * Fixed Bug#192068 > >> ...another fine example of changelog abuse. > > How is that changelog abuse? Uhh, there's no description of the bug. If you're not going to describe any of the fixes in the changelog, why even use a changelog at all? > Methinks this is a case of hair trigger reopen closed bugs > stupidly. Note that the changelog did not actually close the bug. Right, I did not realize that. Nonetheless, it is still a very poor changelog entry. -- Poems... always a sign of pretentious inner turmoil.
Description: PGP signature