Re: security in testing
Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> In that case, I invite any maintainer with a security fix for their package
> in 'testing' to upload it to testing for testing-proposed-updates. Problem
> solved. Are you the one who will be responsible for reviewing the
> packages?
testing, in the absence of a freeze, is a moving target and continuously
updated from unstable, without any kind of review. I fail to see why a t-p-o
=> testing path, or even a separate-testing-updates solution as I've
originally proposed, would need a review, but I'm willing to be
enlightened.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | smurf@smurf.noris.de
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
--
People never change, they only become more who they are.
Reply to: