Re: security in testing
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 03:19:02PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:59:49PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > There are no mirrors of security.debian.org, and have not been for as long
> > as I have been aware. See the security team FAQ.
>
> deb http://mirror.pacific.net.au/debian-security/ stable/updates main
>
> > Do you honestly think would be a good idea to use testing-security this way
> > on a continual basis?
>
> Yes, I do. I think we should release DSA's for security problems in
> testing, too.
>
> > Such an endeavor would not seem to require any of the
> > facilities which make foo-security different from foo{,-proposed-updates}.
>
> The same applies to stable: the key differences are immediacy,
> announcements and control, all of which are equally valuable for testing
> as stable. In any event, testing-proposed-updates exists and works at
> present, the only thing missing is people reliably uploading to it, and
> evaluating whether uploads work well enough to be included in testing
> or not. All the technical issues have already been addressed.
Are the testing-proposed-updates autobuilt on all arches ? I got the impression
that this was not the case, but i may be wrong.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: