Re: conflicts-based solution (was Re: security in testing)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: conflicts-based solution (was Re: security in testing)
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 21:46:23 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030515014623.GA14569@dragon.kitenet.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030515012738.GC20698@alcor.net>
References: <[🔎] 1F31E8A0-864E-11D7-84D2-003065F97418@leishman.org> <[🔎] 20030514213601.GS13945@alcor.net> <[🔎] 20030514231215.GB7786@dragon.kitenet.net> <[🔎] 20030515012738.GC20698@alcor.net>

Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> If no one will step forward to do even this, then surely this service must
> not be considered particularly valuable.

Indeed. I am tempted to do it myself, but I don't currently use
testing..

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: pgpGTqI6umkMq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: security in testing
  - From: Chris Leishman <chris@leishman.org>
- Re: security in testing
  - From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
- conflicts-based solution (was Re: security in testing)
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: conflicts-based solution (was Re: security in testing)
  - From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: defoma (was: Re: Debian MIA check)
Next by Date: ITA: jade, openjade, opensp
Previous by thread: Re: conflicts-based solution (was Re: security in testing)
Next by thread: Re: conflicts-based solution (was Re: security in testing)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread