Re: /run/, resolvconf and read-only root
On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 11:29, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> | If existing behaviour is preserved, then sysadmins shouldn't
> | be offended.
> Sure they can be, having yet another top-level directory.
> It's messy.
The pam maintainer says that if nologin is moved anywhere it
should be moved under /var/run/ (see #191037), so the creation
of new directories isn't an issue in this case.
As an aside: If you want to criticize the proposal to create
the /run/ directory then you are going to have to do better
than label it "messy". What is wrong with the reasons given
for creating /run/, and what alternative to you favor?
Thomas Hood <firstname.lastname@example.org>