Re: Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant)
From: Mark Brown <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant)
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 12:09:38 +0100
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 06:07:28PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > From: Mark Brown <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > > Does this file really change so often that this is a problem? Users
> > > will only be prompted if the distributed version of a conffile has
> > > changed.
> > It is not problem how often language.dat changes but
> > that if it was changed once then users will be prompted
> > everytime at upgrading.
> As Colin says, this is not the case - users will only be prompted when
> the distributed file changes (which is why I was asking how often that
Okay, I misunderstood a bit on this point, but I pointed
out that language.dat was changed between woody/sarge and
sid at least.
> > And I suspect that for users in europe it is not rare to
> > add extra hyphenation pattern, at least.
> Hmm, yes - especially since many of the European hyphenation patterns
> are disbled by default.
Once I overlooked british hyphenation pattern in the list
then I got a bug report soon. cf. bug #183481
> /etc/modules.conf is handled. What I was trying to say was that in the
> past there were problems with the handling of some configuration files
> in the tetex packages but that languages.dat hadn't really registered as
> one that needed special treatment.
It might be enough to say; please see bug #62271
(though its main issue was of language.def).
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <email@example.com>
Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.