On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 01:46:50AM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote: > This is prolly a bad case, since lots of other stuff in > testing depends on libmm11, but doesn't get listed in the > output... Is the output a complete list of packages that > get broken, or just the first 'n'... It's all of the packages that get broken on the first architecture. > (In this case, php4 > depends on libmmnn, and it's held back in the excuses file > for other reasons.) php4 is already broken; so it doesn't show up as breaking. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
Description: PGP signature