On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 01:46:50AM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote:
> This is prolly a bad case, since lots of other stuff in
> testing depends on libmm11, but doesn't get listed in the
> output... Is the output a complete list of packages that
> get broken, or just the first 'n'...
It's all of the packages that get broken on the first architecture.
> (In this case, php4
> depends on libmmnn, and it's held back in the excuses file
> for other reasons.)
php4 is already broken; so it doesn't show up as breaking.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations --
you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
Attachment:
pgpJsibJbqoNE.pgp
Description: PGP signature