[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A testing-scripts question



On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 01:46:50AM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote:
> This is prolly a bad case, since lots of other stuff in
> testing depends on libmm11, but doesn't get listed in the
> output... Is the output a complete list of packages that
> get broken, or just the first 'n'... 

It's all of the packages that get broken on the first architecture.

> (In this case, php4
> depends on libmmnn, and it's held back in the excuses file
> for other reasons.)

php4 is already broken; so it doesn't show up as breaking.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

  ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- 
        you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''

Attachment: pgp2tdC4aChLr.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: