[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mICQ roundup

On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 08:20:52AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 22:36:02 +0100, R?diger Kuhlmann
> <debian-list-Z03BQH65YjkN@ruediger-kuhlmann.de> wrote:
> >There's also the reputation of mICQ at stake. Does Debian improve the
> >reputation of mICQ by shipping an old version of mICQ? Does Debian improve
> >the reputation of mICQ by shipping a version with an extremely annyoing bug
> >that could trivially be fixed, and refusing to fix it several times?
> You are complaining about our release process, which is well
> documented. The release process says: Once it's frozen, we only add
> bug fixes. And once it's stable, we only add security fixes.

I think we can also _remove_ packages if (for example) an
infringement of copyright is discovered after release...

Paul "TBBle" Hampson, MCSE
5th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU
The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)

Of course Pacman didn't influence us as kids. If it did,
we'd be running around in darkened rooms, popping pills and
listening to repetitive music.

This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial
use, duplication and distribution.

Attachment: pgpbr4Ul26dme.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: