Re: Name for configuration packages
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 23:30:03 +0100, Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org>
wrote:
>How about
>
>Package: foo-server
>Depends: foo-config-standalone | foo-config
>
>Package: foo-config-standalone
>Provides: foo-config
>Conflicts: foo-config
>
>This way dpkg and apt will do the right thing.
Which is exactly what I plan to do, but the suffix -standalone is what
I am wondering about. Standalone doesn't fit at all, and my question
actually is abut whether to use -debian or -default, or something
else. I won't use -standalone, that's for sure.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Karlsruhe, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29
Reply to: