Re: Proposal for removal of mICQ package
>>>>> In article <[🔎] 20030214190547.GB24392@valiant.sbg.palfrader.org>, Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org> writes:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Timothy Ball wrote:
>> Hey I can expect the maintainer to at least try to install his own
>> deb and run the program. I'm not saying every pkg should be unit
>> tested... okay maybe I am saying that each pkg should be unit
>> tested, but in the least can chapter 7. of the DNMG have more than
>> just ten sentences?
> You realize that this very trojan was designed to never activate in
> the maintainer's hands?
not only that, it works fine for the developers, it also had
a time delay component designed to let it pass initial battery of
testing. A time delayed DOS trojan -- very clever.
manoj
--
"What is inconceivable about the universe is that it is at all
conceivable." Albert Einstein
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: