On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:25:30PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >>>>> In article <[🔎] 20030213215204.GB18373@tofu.home.mamane.lu>, Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu> writes: > > This brings me to a more general issue: We need a procedure to > > "disown" maintainers. I mean, if they prove they suck at > > maintaining some package, some procedure to assign the package to > > someone else. The initial request could come from upstream, pissed > > off users, something like that (a "plaintiff"). Some procedure (a > > "trial") would then decide whether removing maintainership of that > > package from the maintainer would be just, fair and the better > > thing for Debian, its users, free software. We need a carefully > > crafted policy to guide the trial, to write down how these goals > > should be balanced. > > Cool. Lets see who pissed me off today .... Oh, man. I'm fucked. -- G. Branden Robinson | To stay young requires unceasing Debian GNU/Linux | cultivation of the ability to branden@debian.org | unlearn old falsehoods. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Robert Heinlein
Attachment:
pgpP3lsbKxhhF.pgp
Description: PGP signature