[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal for removal of mICQ package

On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:25:30PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>>>> In article <[🔎] 20030213215204.GB18373@tofu.home.mamane.lu>, Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu> writes:
>  > This brings me to a more general issue: We need a procedure to
>  > "disown" maintainers. I mean, if they prove they suck at
>  > maintaining some package, some procedure to assign the package to
>  > someone else. The initial request could come from upstream, pissed
>  > off users, something like that (a "plaintiff"). Some procedure (a
>  > "trial") would then decide whether removing maintainership of that
>  > package from the maintainer would be just, fair and the better
>  > thing for Debian, its users, free software. We need a carefully
>  > crafted policy to guide the trial, to write down how these goals
>  > should be balanced.
> 	Cool. Lets see who pissed me off today ....

Oh, man.  I'm fucked.

G. Branden Robinson                |      To stay young requires unceasing
Debian GNU/Linux                   |      cultivation of the ability to
branden@debian.org                 |      unlearn old falsehoods.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |      -- Robert Heinlein

Attachment: pgpP3lsbKxhhF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: