Re: Proposal for removal of mICQ package
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:55, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> You cannot ask the maintainers to review every single line of upstream
> code, especially when it is moving fast (I don't know whether it is the
> case for micq). Or else, we will have to seriously decrease the number
> of packages we provide.
I think that the OpenBSD project demonstrates that if you try to audit all the
code you package then you won't have all the software that people want.
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page