On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 16:28:03 +0100, Jesus Climent wrote: > Maybe not. Maybe for the same reason Pentium IV was transformed to > Pentium 4 after a survey revealed that for some Americans it did not > make sense that IV is 4, so it should have been Pentium IIII which is in > no way a roman number. Oh yes, it is. http://members.aol.com/lolathrop/roman/iv.html Kind regards, Martin