[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gcc 3.2 transition in unstable

On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 02:21:00PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:

> However, absent of a widely-adopted convention on this, there seems to be
> little that we can do without breaking *something*. Are there any
> architecture-wide conventions for C++ .so ABI's? (From the little I know,
> it seems not; which would explain the problems we're having here.) 

This is exactly what gcc is moving towards, and exactly the reason why this
pain is beneficial in the end.

 - mdz

Reply to: