Re: gcc 3.2 transition in unstable
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 02:21:00PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> However, absent of a widely-adopted convention on this, there seems to be
> little that we can do without breaking *something*. Are there any
> architecture-wide conventions for C++ .so ABI's? (From the little I know,
> it seems not; which would explain the problems we're having here.)
This is exactly what gcc is moving towards, and exactly the reason why this
pain is beneficial in the end.