Adam Heath writes: > On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Ryan Murray wrote: > > > * If you maintain a library written in C++: > > [snip] > > Er, won't we *have* to specify build-depends on gcc >= 3.2? Otherwise, the > maintainer will have changed the package names, and modified the .shlibs, but > the buildds will attempt to build against some random gcc. yes, the build-depends should include "gcc (>= 3:3.2)", and build-essentials should be changed as well.