[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

UNSUSCRIBE



----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerhard Tonn" <GerhardTonn@gammatau.de>
To: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 6:59 AM
Subject: Re: Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r1


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Saturday 02 November 2002 23:28, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r1
> >
> > =====================================
> >
> > An up-to-date version is at <http://master.debian.org/~joey/3.0r1/>.
>
> Hi,
> I have just noticed the following
>
> >kernel-patch-2.4.17-s390   stable  0.0.20020415-1  all, source
> >kernel-patch-2.4.17-s390   updates  0.0.20020816-0.woody.1 all, source
> >
> > * Integrated a new kernel-patch from the IBM Developerworks website
> > (released on 2002.06.12). This patch fixes the DASD deadlock problem and
> > some other severe problems. * Removed NMU DASD deadlock fix. *
Integrated a
> > new kernel-patch from the IBM Developerworks website (released on
> > 2002.08.16). This patch fixes a problem related to the IUCV driver.
> >
> >   This sounds like a more or less regular update to me, which should not
> > target the stable release.
>
> This is not true. The woody kernel is definitely broken on s390, deadlock
in
>  I/O code. Fortunately we have a working kernel as part of the
boot-floppies,
>  so that most of our users didn't notice it, but we had already several
>  problems with the kernel when users build their own. So please accept the
>  update. We need not only the kernel-patch, but also an update of the
>  kernel-image. It wasn't accepted by katie, probably because katie accepts
>  only one .udeb per package and architecture. Should I upload a version of
>  the kernel-image without an .udeb?
>
> Thanks,
> Gerhard
>
> - -------------------------------------------------------
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE9zKRh2m0l3zLXWBIRAjy6AJ9FrHDqzPd6sMIjwIaVaosgZqd6nwCeJBW3
> qYe0Pb3n5wslDUWy3Ghg90c=
> =44eh
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: