John Goerzen wrote: > > Why are you upset about it? Was the quality of the NMU bad? One of the > > main points of a BSP is afaik that you can make NMUs to delayed > > _without_ previous notice to the maintainer. > > I see no reason that a BSP should be a "sanctioned but undocumented > exception to procedure". Why not follow standard procedures? Standard procedure for NMU's was considerably relaxed (or rather, clarified) this winter by the release manager. The developers reference is just that: a reference of typical best practice. Sometimes it's expedient to not follow its every letter, and that's ok. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
pgpeccHeaoGF9.pgp
Description: PGP signature