Re: GCC 3.2 transition
Previously Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> 1. Does a C (not C++) library compiled with gcc 2.95 work with
> a C++ program compiled with gcc 3.2?
Yes
> 2. Does this mean I must not use gcc 3.2 before it becomes gcc-defaults?
> There may be a case where gcc 3.2 offers better optimization.
Yes.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/wichert@wiggy.net This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org http://www.wiggy.net/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: