Re: please remove current libsdl-image1.2, libsdl-perl etc. from sarge.

[Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>]

Josselin Mouette <josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org> immo vero scripsit:

> There is no one to blame, as this could have happened to anyone,
> including you and me. What we can conclude is that :
> 1) we should not forget to use priorities,

Priorities isn't a field to control dependencies.

libsdl-image1.2 should really have conflicted with anything
that was compiled against libsdl-image1.2 and libpng2.

And the easiest way to accomplish it is to use different
package name. See chapter 9 of libpkg-guide, which
discusses this point.


regards,
	junichi

-- 
dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa   http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423  7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/