On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 06:53:15PM +0200, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote: > W li?cie z nie, 09-06-2002, godz. 13:46, Florian Weps pisze: > > On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 06:37:09PM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > > > Il Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 01:43:12PM -0500, Alex Lau ha scritto: > > > > I don't notice there is any debian-database mailing. Does anyone feel > > > > that is neccessary? > > > > > > Yes, > > > I would like to have a database policy in order to install applications > > > that require an SQL engine. > > > > > > Maybe a database mailing would be the best place where to start a talk > > > about it. > > > > > > If you want to ask for that mailing list I will second it. > > > > So would I. > > Hmm... I haven't seen so much traffic about databases here. > I think that you should first consider trying to discuss the things here > and if the traffic grows - then move to separate mailing list. > But of course maybe there sth in d-d that prevents successful discussion > on this topic? (no idea) Lots of traffic, which makes it hard to track down DB specific stuff, especially in the archives. > I would be afraid that this way you would create another deadly silent > mailing list with few subscribers. Debian-games comes to mind. You could be right. I'd like to try anyway, and I believe that a debian-db yould be more successful because: * debian is not the distribution of choice for gamers * debian _is_ popular on web-servers, running CGIs and servlets connected to data bases. Think of all the groupware packages. Debian-java, for example, is not high-volume, but it is nice to have all java related discussion in one place. > I am interested in this topic too, but it seems unsure if creation of > separate m-l will succeed. So let's get started discussing here, for now. For one thing, I am currently packaging SQL Relay, a data base connection proxy. See bug #119700 for the ITP. The upstream home page is at <http://firstworks.com> Usable packages for i386 and powerpc are at <http://web.green.ch/fweps> and <http://ehec.foorborne-net.de/~wepsf>. Since this software is so diverse (many DB engines, many APIs), I can't really test it all by myself; I _do_ have testers, but could use more. Secondly, Giuseppe suggested a policy document for packages that rely on a DB engine. I don't see much need for yet another policy document (packaging SQL Relay got me in contact with many policy documents - all useful, mind you), but maybe I am overlooking some serious points - such as what happens to client software when the DB gets updated. What are your arguments in favour of a DB-policy, Giuseppe? > Regards > > Grzegorz Prokopski I am subscribed to debian-devel; no need to To: or Cc: me. Florian -- Ben> I don't think anybody has done a Intercal machine yet, since Intercal is Ben> not exactly the #1 langauge to program in. Paul> Intel has one, but few seem to want to buy it for some odd reason. -- Ben Franchuk and Paul Repacholi in comp.sys.dec (2002)
Attachment:
pgpTSoOzidHtW.pgp
Description: PGP signature