Re: possible mass-filing of bugs, continued, script refined: list of packages that apparently have disparity between package name and shared lib soname
On 02 Jun 2002 15:58:24 +0200,
Andreas Rottmann <a.rottmann@gmx.at> wrote:
> Is it stated somewhere in policy that the SOVERSION has to be the last
> part of the package name? I can't find that requirement there...
The Policy says (version 3.5.6.0, section 11.3):
| For a straightforward library which has a development environment and
| a runtime kit including just shared libraries you need to create two
| packages: `<libraryname><soversion>', where `<soversion>' is the
| version number in the soname of the shared library[1] and
| `<libraryname><soversion>-dev'.
--
Oohara Yuuma <oohara@libra.interq.or.jp>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
I always put away what I take.
--- Ryuji Akai, "Star away"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: