On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 09:40:17AM +0000, malcolm@ivywell.screaming.net wrote: > Ah, but it doesn't say "must", it says "should". You're thinking of the RFC meanings of MUST and SHOULD here. The policy document uses those words differently. Not following a "must" requirement is a release-critical bug, and not following a "should" requirement is a normal bug. There's no difference in intent, just in severity. Richard Braakman