[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: *Please* fix spamassassin's score configuration



On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 11:47:49PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:

> If high priorities were available to the security team only, then that's a
> different issue, but discouraging ordinary subscribers and especially
> non-subscribed random posters from using Priority: High on a community
> list (me! me! me! I want help first!) is a very good thing, IMHO.

> And considering that Priority: High has a certain but limited spam
> correlation on such lists, it's as useful (when used with care) as any
> other item with such a correlation.

I would say there is a very high correlation between what I consider junk
email, and what is sent with a high priority.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: pgpeYMi83Fuqi.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: