[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New maintainer behaviour with NMU and LogJam's hijacking

And I'm sure everyone really appreciates that kind of arrogance. You've 
just exemplified the very reason why people aren't burning effigies of 
me at the moment. Last time I checked (unless I'm completely off here), 
users much preferred real progress over pretentious bureaucracy. I 
really don't care whether you want to give over maintainership to 
anyone, and me making the NMU was never meant to influence that even in 
the slightest, and I don't deny that it was wrong to rush an upload of 
xscreensaver like that. In the meantime, people seem to be perfectly 
happy with the packages I do maintain.

Effort. It's a wonderful thing.

P.S. I was referring to LogJam not being updated in a year and a half.

> And at this point, even though I'd *love* to turn xscreensaver
> maintenance over to someone I don't like, I still don't think I want 
> you maintaining something I type my password into on a regular basis
> until you learn to play well with others.

Reply to: