[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Re: Bug#169450: wrong assumption on char signedness

[Emile van Bergen]
> I agree, but I'm willing to bet that assuming sizeof(char) is 1 is more
> portable today than assuming stdint.h is available.

Actually, 1 == sizeof(char is defined in the ANSI C standard: The sizeof operator

  2 The sizeof operator yields the size (in bytes) of its operand,
    which may be an expression or the parenthesized name of a type.
  3 When applied to an operand that has type char, unsigned char or
    signed char, (or a qualified version thereof) the result is 1.

sizeof() always give sizes in multiples of sizeof(char).  It do not
say anything about the number of bits storable in type char.  The
definition of bytes is given earlier in the standard:

  3.4 Byte

  1 The unit of data storage large enough to hold any member of the
    basic character set of the execution environemnt.  It shall be
    possible to express the address of each individual byte of an
    object uniquely.  A byte is composed of a contiguous sequence of
    bits, the number of which is implementation-defined.  The list
    significant bit is called the low-order bit; the most significant
    bit is called the high-order bit.

Reply to: