Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:58:16 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021119165816.GA5320@dragon.kitenet.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1021118205909.5937A-100000@wakko.debian.net>
References: <[🔎] 20021119013357.GA3397@dragon.kitenet.net> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1021118205909.5937A-100000@wakko.debian.net>

Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> I don't know for certain, but I find it hard to belive that so many
> minor debian versions are changing binary compatibility in any way at
> all.

Those glibc guys are pulling from cvs on like a daily basis. <insert
overfiend rant>.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: pgpYG8NjejYwe.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: orphaning my packages
Next by Date: Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?
Previous by thread: Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?
Next by thread: Re: Why are new package versions depending on libc6 in unstable?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread