Colin Walters wrote: > I would prefer if our descriptions didn't have technical terms like > "GTK2" so prominently listed, when it is not necessary. For someone > with technical knowledge, the fact that it uses GTK will be pretty > immediately obvious from the program name. I wholeheartedly agree. I've seen this type of thing done in package descriptions generally for UI toolkit and implementation language. Both might make sense in corner cases, but it generally doesn't matter enough to go in the description. And surely not a short description. > Description : utility for listing open files A marvel of readability and clarity compared to the original. Still I'd maybe throw in a "graphical" here. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
pgpPsNg8TVz71.pgp
Description: PGP signature