[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian versioning scheme (r1 vs .1)

Il lun, 2002-11-04 alle 19:05, Morten Brix Pedersen ha scritto:
> Hi list,
> This is not meant to be flamebait, but simply something I was thinking
> about after reading Joey Hess post to debian-devel-announce regarding
> Debian woody 3.0r1.
> I am wondering why updates to the Debian GNU/Linux distribution uses the
> much alternative versioning syntax, such as 2.2r7, 3.0r1 etc.
> In my opinion, 3.0.1 is a much clearer and more commonly used syntax.
> .or is it just me who thinks the latter is much nicer?

go search the archives.

Federico Di Gregorio
Debian GNU/Linux Developer & Italian Press Contact        fog@debian.org
INIT.D Developer                                           fog@initd.org
  We are all dust, Saqi, so play the lute
                    We are all wind, Saqi, so bring wine. -- Omar Khayam

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: