Re: FTBFS for Archetecture all package (Bug#167049)
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 07:29:29AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Nov 2002, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Does documentation package of "Architecture: all" which has been build
> > properly in the stable but not in the unstable due to tetex differences
> > deserve to receive "serious" bug (RC bug) report or not?
> Yes, since it HAS the bug. It should, however, be tagged "sid", to make it
> clear that the package in "woody" doesn't have the problem.
This is completely unnecessary, for reference. The sid tag's main purpose
is so you can differentiate bugs that apply to only woody, or to woody
_and_ sid (or sarge or potato).
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Reply to: