On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 09:52:32AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org> [2002.10.31.2224 +0100]: > > least which package is meant and, also address the original ITPer > > directly, for he/she may not be reading debian-devel anymore. > > Now wouldnt' that be a clear violation of maintainer duties? > What do we do in such a case? Reading debian-devel is not a maintainer duty, afaik only devel-announce is. Or is it not fullfilling a ITP that is a "clear violation of maintainer duties"? -- Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 77F1 7FF5 C2E6 7BF2 F228
Attachment:
pgpNkWifiTnMB.pgp
Description: PGP signature