Re: Bug#164301: ITP: runit -- a UNIX init scheme with service supervision
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:57:12AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> This method still sucks. What happened with those ideas about integrating
> or developing an init program that uses a dependency map between the init
> scripts, so the user can set priorities?! Ie. "start SSH as soon as
> possible, including all required prequisites (networking, hostname,
> firewall)" or "start mta, fetchmail and gettys as soon as possible, other
> things can run in background".
I believe this work is happening through LSB; you can start a discussion
there. The last time I looked, it seemed to be using comments in
initscripts a la chkconfig, which I don't find very appealing.